Showing posts with label Illustration. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Illustration. Show all posts

03 February 2020

History Snoopin': Little men, and ladies' choice - It's Leap Year


Little men, and ladies' choice
By Bill Miller for the Mail Tribune
Monday, February 3rd 2020
By the turn of the last century, the only males fearing leap year were gullible school boys.
It was a terrifying threat to a little boy that he would actually have to marry that cute second-grader in the next row, just because she asked.
Guilty as charged.
It all began in that two-room schoolhouse in North Albany — for those who don’t know, it’s up in the Willamette Valley.
North Albany School, Oregon
In that leap year of long ago, it must have been our teacher, Mrs. Wilson, who decided to tease us. She seemed so serious, but looking back, I think she must have been holding back one whopper of a laugh. She warned that we “little men” could all be married by December.
WHAT??
OK. Just like most little men in the second grade, I was afraid of girls. But that didn’t mean I didn’t like them as friends. One of my best friends of the feminine persuasion was Sandy. Notice how carefully I worked my way around the word “girlfriend?”
Sandy and I talked a lot, and she was always smiling at me and complimenting me about one thing or another. I suppose she was flirting, but how would I know? I was just a little man.
Well, after Mrs. Wilson’s dire warning, I didn’t know what to do. What if Sandy asked me to marry her? I didn’t even have a job, and where would we live? That was a lot of heavy thinking for a little man in the second grade. Scary too!

If only I had known then how, in the 5th century, St. Patrick had handled the situation. Maybe you remember.
While St. Patrick was driving all those snakes out of Ireland, St. Bridget, a single woman, showed up with a complaint. It was unfair, she said, that a woman had to wait for a man to propose marriage.
After some fierce haggling, the story goes, they reached a consensus — every four years a woman could ask a man to marry her.
Immediately, St. Bridget asked Pat to marry her, and he just as quickly refused. We never agreed, he said, that a man must accept.
There’s mathematical and scientific reasoning behind leap year, of course, but it doesn’t have anything to do with getting married.
Leap year is supposed to run like a clock, where every fourth year is a leap year, and a February 29th is added to the calendar, right? Well, no. Even science has its exceptions.
If you can divide a year by four, it’s a leap year — except years ending in two zeros — unless those years are evenly divisible by 400. So, 2000 (aka: Y2K) was a leap year, but 1800 and 1900 weren’t, and 2100 won’t be one either.
If you had fun with that, my friend — you’re welcome!

If I had to guess, and I think I’m on safe ground here, I don’t really think there are any women sitting on a hope chest every night, eagerly waiting for a February 29th to suddenly pop up on their calendar so they will have a legitimate right to propose to some clueless dude.
So, rest easy little men. They’re only pulling your leg.
Oh, and Sandy? As fondly as I remember that cute, blonde, second-grader of the feminine persuasion, we never got married. Sandy and I wrote a few letters back and forth after my family moved away, but one day the letters just stopped.
I suspect she moved on, having met up with an exciting little man in the third grade.
Have a safe and sane leap year.
Writer Bill Miller is the author of five books, including “History Snoopin’,” a collection of his previous history columns and stories. Reach him at newsmiller@live.com.


25 March 2019

Part Two: Train robbery goes to court


Train robbery goes to court
by Bill Miller for the Mail Tribune Monday, March 25th 2019

Last week’s column was about the daring night holdup of a Southern Pacific train north of Riddle, July 1, 1895, and the case came to trial six months later.

Of the three men charged for robbing the train and stealing the U.S. Mail, John Case was believed to be the masked man who, with six-gun in hand, brazenly walked the cars of the train, robbing passengers and the train crew, while partners James and Albert Pool lit up the sky with a pyrotechnic display outside the train; their dynamite blasts and gunshots meant to terrorize and intimidate passengers.

Prior to the robbery, Case had just been released after serving two years in the state penitentiary for
burglary. He had served a previous term for armed robbery. James Pool, Case’s cousin, had been in the penitentiary three times, convicted of horse stealing, extortion and manslaughter. Albert Pool served two years for theft.

On the bench in the Portland courthouse was U.S. District Court Judge Charles Bellinger, who took an active part in the proceedings, at one point reprimanding the government prosecutor for mentioning the defendants’ previous convictions in front of the jury.
“The government,” Bellinger said as he glared at the prosecutor, “ought to be cautious to see not only that justice is done, but that no error is made!”
By the second day of the trial, Bellinger was already annoyed with both attorneys.
“Judge Bellinger infused a little ginger into the cross examinations,” wrote an Oregonian reporter, “by commenting on the lawyers’ propensity to drag and repeat themselves and go over and over the same testimony until it became tiresome.”
Conflicting testimony from a number of witnesses and physical evidence that was questionable left the outcome questionable. When the jury quickly returned with a guilty verdict for Case and James Pool and acquittal for Albert Pool, Bellinger expressed his concern.
“I am frank to say that I am not entirely satisfied with the verdict.”
Bellinger granted the defense an appeal hearing, and at the end of June 1896 issued a 35-page decision, setting aside the guilty verdicts and immediately releasing Case and Pool from prison.
Bellinger said the identification of Case by eyewitnesses “does not tend to similarity, but rather in the opposite direction.”
Among other discrepancies listed by Bellinger were horse and boot tracks, allegedly found at a camp believed occupied by the train robbers before the robbery. Discovered July 2, the tracks were not compared until July 8 — four days after a heavy rain.
“There is nothing to sustain the guilty verdict,” he wrote. “It is against the evidence and must be set aside, and it is so ordered.”
Judge Bellinger may have believed Case and Pool were guilty, but he was following the law. He said he believed they were convicted only because of their past criminal history and because evidence was gathered hastily in pursuit of the $3,000 reward offered by Southern Pacific Railroad.
The robbery was never solved and never again went to trial.
Writer Bill Miller is the author of “History Snoopin’,” a collection of his previous history columns and stories. Reach him at newsmiller@live.com or WilliamMMiller.com.


History Snoopin': The Girls of Summer

The Girls of Summer by Bill Miller for the Mail Tribune Monday, June 8th 2020 It simply couldn’t be true. The Girls...